Default Header

Strongman Analysis ….. Revisited

Well it’s finally here …. Whitelabs have figured out the source of their error in IBU analysis and the results are in …. drum roll ….

Style: Test Pale Brand: Note Strongman *999151* 999151 Units Valu Mean Results All Beer This Style

 		 IBU IBU 54.0 17.8 19.2

Density SG 1.012 2.683 1.009

Alcohol Percent Vol/Vol 8.62 6.18 5.83

Apparent Extract Plato 3.18 2.67 2.35

Real Extract Plato 6.14 4.85 4.44

Apparent Attenuation Percent 83.02 81.38 82.25

Real Attenuation Percent 69.38 67.42 68.01
   

so there we have it, 54 I.B.U. which makes Graham Green the winner with his guess of 52. Congratulations!

   

 We also had the 2010 batch of Hot Monkey Love analysed and just in case you’re interested the results for that are…

Style: Test Strong Ale Brand: Note Hot Monkey Love *999152* 999152 Units Valu Mean Results All Beer This Style

IBU IBU 43.0 17.8 20.9

Density SG 1.013 2.683 1.015

Alcohol Percent Vol/Vol 9.81 6.18 7.24

Apparent Extract Plato 3.23 2.67 3.77

Real Extract Plato 6.55 4.85 6.28

Apparent Attenuation Percent 84.40 81.38 77.52

Real Attenuation Percent 70.73 67.42 64.75

Good stuff!

Tags:

2 Responses to “Strongman Analysis ….. Revisited”

  1. Chris Posted at 8:03 am on March 25th, 2010

    Damn, you get some serious attenuation :)

  2. Steve Posted at 11:24 am on March 25th, 2010

    As I’ve said many times, despite its bad rep., Ringwood is a damn fine yeast!

Leave a Reply